Tuesday 28 March 2017

ARE PRENUPS NECESSARY?


After a long research, in different web pages, relating to what are prenups, now I can create my own definition about this term. Therefore, Prenuptial Agreements is an agreement between the couple, before the marriage, where they specifies what each person's property rights will be in case of divorce. Such agreements already existed long ago, where only economic interests were agreed in case of divorce. But, definitely, the fashions always come back and this can not only be seen in fashion, but also in these types of agreements, which are becoming fashionable. As in everything, this new agreement has good things and other things that aren't so good, its pros and cons.


On one hand, this premarital agreement has some pros. Above all, this can be useful for rich or famous people because if you have, for example, your own business or a lot of money, it can't be divided and can't be subject to the control or involvement of your former spouse upon divorce.


Besides, apart from economic interests, it can also be beneficial for children, because this agreement can protect the inheritance rights of children from previous marriages and it can also determine custody of the child, always in case of separation.


It should be noted that if one spouse has more debt than the other, with the agreement it can protect the debt-free spouse, so he or she haven't to assume the obligations of the other. In general, you can agree to the distribution of decisions and responsibilities.


On the other hand, this agreement also have some cons. Most disadvantages are financial. For example, if you help your partner in his business, you may not be entitled to claim a share of money. This agreement also implies to give up your right to inherit from your spouse's estate when he or she dies.


A part from this economic issues, it also has another disadvantages, for example, if you start a relationship with a contract that sets forth the particulars of what will happen upon death or divorce can engender a sense of lack of trust.


From my point of view, I totally disagree with this type of agreements. I think that the last one disadvantage that I written invalidates all the advantages that I have exposed. The most beautiful thing about a relationship is trust. Therefore, starting with a contract gives an impression of lack of confidence and, most importantly, lack of love and affection. That is why I don't understand that before getting married, which according to what people says is one of the most beautiful things in life, you think of an agreement like that.


Pages consulted:

Saturday 11 March 2017

SCRIPT


Scenario: Cafeteria.

Characters: Gina and Kim.

Gina: Hi Kim! how are you? It has been a long time since we met

Kim: Hi Gina! It's true, too long ago. I'm fine and you?

Gina: Very good! Well I have an idea!!

Kim: What idea?

Gina: I thought we could make a trip to spend more time together and remember old times, couldn't we? What do you say?

Kim: I would love to, but I cannot…

Gina: Why?

Kim: Because I'm saving money and I really need it

Gina: Really? But so much money?

Kim: Yes, because I want to fulfill my dream in a couple of months.

Gina: Oh nice!! What good news! what is your dream?

Kim: Make me a lipo!

Gina: What!! Oh my God, is that your dream?

Kim: Of course!

Gina: I can’t believe it!

Kim: Why?

Gina: Because you are beautiful just the way you are and, in my opinion, you do not have to spend all this money in this way. I think it's the best way to throw the money!

Kim: I don’t think the same.

Gina: Okay, but I want you to reflect about this and I want you to listen to me. Money is hard to win and there are many beautiful things in life to invest in them, so please don’t let society eat your head and don’t fall into that trap, your imperfections make you pretty and unique, believe me.

Kim: Okay, I will reflect! But I don't promise nothing! You want to see us another day?

Gina: Of course!

(Some Weeks later…)

Kim: Hi Gina!! How are you?

Gina: Hi Kim! I’m fine and you?

Kim: I have to tell you something!

Gina: Tell me!

Kim: Finally, I don’t operate, I was reflecting and I realized that you are right, everyone is as it is and we should accept ourselves as we are.

Gina: Oh Kim!! I’m so happy with your choice! So, if we can make our trip, can we?

Kim: Of course, I think that it is the best idea you’ve had.

MILLIONS OF PEOPLE ARE CANCELLING THEIR NETFLIX ACCOUNT BECAUSE OF THIS ONE SITE



SUMMARY:

This news was published March 6th and it is about a new tv/movie subscription site that is taking the world by storm. So, the writer investigate how the site works and why it is getting famous. 

The writer exposes that this site is have more than 10.000 films and tv shows to watch because it can provide you everything that cable and online streaming sites could. In addition, all the films and programs are shown in HD quality, it can be streamed on your computer, tablet or mobile phone and it is completely legal. But the best part is that this site is allowing all users to sign up for free, thing done to compete against the giants in online streaming. So, many consumers are flocking over to take advantage of this opportunity and that’s why they are cancelling their online subscriptions, like in their Netflix account. Finally, the writer add that he doesn’t know how much longer this site will continue to allow users to sign up for free.

MY OPINION:

This type of opportunity is the best idea for subscribers, but I also think that it is a type of offer that damages the other companies and, therefore, they are techniques of the aggressive marketing.

In my point of view, these activities remind me of my research work when traditional business owners explained some marking techniques used by multinationals and which greatly damaged their small business, so I consider them comparable to these unethical techniques used by multinationals.

Nowadays all the companies are focused on get the most money, so none of them are concerned about the damage they can do depending on what actions they do. That’s why, in my opinion, all these companies must reach an agreement in which all beneficiaries can win.
WORDS I DIDN'T KNOW:


Monday 6 March 2017

VANDALS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR DOZENS OF TIPPED GRAVES AT JEWISH CEMETERY IN BROOKLYN, MANAGEMENT SAYS



SUMMARY:

This news, which was published last March 5th by Edgar Sandoval, Laura Dimon and Reuven Blau, is about the dispute stemming from 42 tombstones fallen on a Jewish cemetery. So, some people argue that it was an act of vandalism and others that it wasn’t.

On the one hand, police and the general manager of a Jewish cemetery in Brooklyn said that the memorials had naturally tipped over due to age. In this group, who argue that has not been vandalism, highlights the role of Marisa Tarantino and some police who has spoken with the reporters.

On the other hand, a few days later a trio of officials demanded an investigation. The Assemblyman Dov Hikind said that they aren’t talking about tombstones that are naturally lying down and, to prove that, he said that we only have to walk in there and see that something is just not right.

At last, the Albany pol said the police commissioner and the hate crime task force visited the area. They visited the Jewish Cemetery because these officials found some suspicious evidence like a section of barbed wire missing in the area facing the toppled tombstones.

MY OPINION:

In my point of view, this tombstones were derived purposely. I say that because some of them were not old and, besides, the officials found this evidence of the barbed wire missing. I don’t know why these people have been slow to heed these officials if they have found evidence. They investigating the case wouldn't lose anything, but if they discovered something they could win many answers.

After looking for news for the blog, I have notice that nowadays hate crimes are going up. So, I really think that these cases have to be seriously investigated and dealt with.

Finally, as a conclusion, I have to say that if this has really been an act of vandalism against the Jews, again, mankind proves that it has not learned anything from history and the mistakes made throughout it.

WORDS I DIDN’T KNOW:

·         Barbed

·         Wire

·         spokesman